Exercise Classes|Exercise DVDs

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Follow Us

Browse by Title

STUDIO BLOGS

BURR'S BAR METHOD BLOG

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

WHAT'S WRONG WITH PILATES

  
  
  
  

Pilates has quite a bit of magic to recommend it.  First it gives its students a warm, burning sensation in their abs.  Second, its association with dancers, rehabilitation and the idea of long, lean muscles makes it appealing to Americans trying to shed their bulk.  Third, it allows its students enjoy the luxury of lying down to exercise. 

These features - plus the fact that Pilates came along when current popular exercise forms such as yoga lacked core work - has made it one of the most respected and popular exercise techniques in modern times.

Let's step back for a moment and take a fresh look at Pilates:

Pilates practitioners claim that using less muscular loading than conventional weight training creates longer, leaner muscles.  Physiologists however, generally agree that strength training does not "bulk up" muscles but instead leads to a slimmer body.  Pilates, they point out, uses loads that are too light to achieve this end.  At the same time, they say, the prone position used in many Pilates exercises lessens participation by the muscles responsible for posture and coordination.

Further, Pilates' reputation as an effective rehabilitation technique has not held up to modern principles of physical therapy.  For example, Pilates' practice of flexing the back beyond its normal range of motion, places unnecessary stress on the spine.  Its repertoire of exercises are in fact too athletic and risky for most rehab patients. 

Finally, Pilates workouts are supposed to strengthen the core muscles.  While Pilates does strengthen the abdominals, it gives short shrift to another part of the core, one that's in special need of attention these days: the glutes. 

Instead Pilates focuses so much of its attention on the hip-flexors it can cause "malalignment of the pelvis" and "spinal compression in the low back" according to a study reported in the Feb 2005 IDEA Fitness Journal. 

Add it all up: Pilates' lack of balanced core strengthening, the excess stress it places on the wrists, spine and shoulders, its lack of strengthening, its absence of aerobic conditioning, the nonexistence of a spiritual or inspirational component, and you end up with one conclusion:  it's about time for exercise to get better.

Comments

Interesting. Do you feel the same way about yoga? What might yoga be missing that the bar method provides?
Posted @ Friday, February 20, 2009 1:10 PM by Collee
I have been doing the bar method workout for 2 months now and I have seen a change in my body that I have not gotten from other forms of exercise. I have done yoga, pilates, weight training, aerobics, etc. I still do yoga (38 years now) because I enjoy it but it has never given me what the bar method has. And neither did the weight training or aerobic exercises. All I got was bulky. It is such a relief to finally find something that has given me what I have been looking for.
Posted @ Friday, February 20, 2009 2:30 PM by Patricia
We will be doing a blog on yoga soon. Keep tuned!
Posted @ Friday, February 27, 2009 12:13 PM by Mimi Fleischman
I fell in love with Bar Method several years ago but due to an intense back injury I opted to start back to exercise through Pilates Allegro reformer work. I have to disagree with the comment the author makes that pilates categorically ignores the glutes. I have an instructor who leads us in a very well rounded work out and have seen and felt tremendous improvement in my core strength, flexibility, range or motion and yes, higher glutes (just like the Bar Method). I believe there need not be an either/or approach to the Bar Method, Pilates or any other routine that works well for an individual. I miss the Bar Method results and hope to add it back into my routine at some point.
Posted @ Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:04 AM by Stacey
Pilates does not have many exercises in the prone position, as you write in your article. 
(It would be a better system if it did, as most movement in life is forward, inward and downward.) 
Pilates developed his exercises nearly 100 years ago, and the so-called "original work" is out dated for sure. 
Pilates' greatest contribution was the idea of the mind-body connection. 
What exactly is the "spiritual" part of the bar method? 
From the teachings of Eve Gentry, Ron Fletcher and others, there is, with the best Pilates teachers, a tremendous emphasis on the importance of excellent posture in all movement.
Posted @ Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:26 AM by barbara mueller
I did Pilates for three years and always felt that some of the moves were too stressful on specific body parts (i.e. all your weight on one foot which is pressed into a metal bar while you raise all your body weight). I finally quit the last time after a stress fracture in a small bone in my foot...which occured while doing the above mentioned move. Love the Bar method!
Posted @ Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:45 PM by Becky Willis
Yeah could not agree with this article more. I think Pilates is very overated. I think the Bar method is a far more effective form of exercise in my opinion.
Posted @ Wednesday, March 18, 2009 3:01 PM by JS
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics